Snowager Tooth Amulet (r101) [Special]View in Item Database
DescriptionSupposedly made from a lost tooth of the Snowager, this Amulet is extremly rare. Snowager Tooth Amulet

Multiuse


Average Rating [?]
1
Attack *air**air**water**water*
Defense *-fire**-fire*
Reflect N/A
Effects N/A
Actual Icons
ATTACK AIR 2 ATTACK WATER 2 DEFENSE FIRE 2  
JN Price -
Restocks At N/A
Used By N/A
Notes None
Ratings - Snowager Tooth Amulet
Rating:
1
This weapon will only be rated for Regular 1P/2P use, since it doesn't have any niche or league use.

Price(0/3): Way, way more expensive than it's worth. You could easily buy way more useful battledome items with the amount of neopoints this one costs.
Power(0/5): The amount of icons this weapon does is too low for today's battledome while it barely defends against any icons, defeating the purpose of a dual duty. It'd be better to focus on either attack or defence instead of splitting total icons like this.
Uniqueness(0/2): Dual duties should compromise a bit of attacking power for extra defence or the other way around. This, like many others, is just underpowered.

Overall it's just your average underpowered, useless item. Nothing worth checking out here. Because of that its final rating is 0/10. I can't give a rating of 0 however, so it gets a shameful 1 instead.

Rated on January 31, 2021

Rating:
1
Price/Power (0/5)
Far too weak, period

Countermeasures (0/5)
No.

Alternatives Upgrades or Downgrades
At least get a Scarab Ring or Scroll of the Scholar

Other Points

Final Thoughts
Good thing you will never see this outside of 1P normally.

Rated on April 24, 2014

Rating:
1
Overview: Supposedly made from a lost tooth of the Snowager, but you can tell it's a fake.

The Good: I don't think I have anything to put here. The art isn't terrible but it isn't particularly great either.

The Bad: Everything. 4 icons of offense isn't even close to enough with only 2 icons of defense. This is how we KNOW that the amulet is a fake.

The Ugly Truth: This weapon is gallery fodder. Don't get it. Please.

Rated on December 31, 2013